UK National Action Plan 2025: Kersten Council Compliance Guide
Author: Sean Faulkner, Contributing Author of the Defra-funded Parks for London IWM Reference Guide 2025
Last Updated: February 2026
🏛️ About This Guide
This is the Kersten technical implementation guide for UK councils transitioning to pesticide-free weed management under the UK Pesticides National Action Plan (NAP) 2025.
Authority: This guide was authored by Sean Faulkner of Kersten UK, who contributed to the Defra-funded Parks for London IWM Reference Guide 2025 — the UK government standard for council pesticide reduction — and authored the Lantra-Certified IWM Training Syllabus (Course 35943).
Evidence Base: Field trial by Bracknell Town Council (2026) demonstrating that mechanical prevention reduces thermal/chemical treatments by over 50%.
Contact for Strategy Review: Sean Faulkner, 0118 986 9253 | Request Compliance Audit
📋 What is the National Action Plan 2025?
The UK Pesticides National Action Plan (NAP) 2025 is a government framework requiring all public authorities — including councils, housing associations, highways agencies, and amenity managers — to:
- Reduce reliance on chemical pesticides in public spaces
- Implement Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies
- Prioritize non-chemical alternatives wherever feasible
- Document and report pesticide use and reduction efforts
Legal Context:
While the NAP 2025 is not directly enforceable law, it operates alongside existing legal obligations under:
- Environmental Protection Act 1990, Section 89 (Duty to keep land clear of litter and refuse)
- Code of Practice on Litter and Refuse (COPLAR) standards
⚖️ Your Obligations as a Council
Section 89 EPA 1990: The Hidden Link to Weed Control
Critical Insight: Most councils treat weed control as an aesthetic issue. It is not. Weed growth is a symptom of failing your statutory cleansing duties, leading to surface water, weeds, potholes and other surface degradation.
The Legal Framework: - Law: Environmental Protection Act 1990, Section 89 requires councils to keep land "clear of litter and refuse." - Standard: COPLAR defines "Detritus" as dust, mud, soil, grit, and rotted vegetation. - The Connection: Detritus IS the growing medium for weeds.
COPLAR Grading Structure: - Grade A: No litter or detritus → Weeds cannot germinate (no soil) - Grade B: Predominantly free → Low weed risk - Grade C: Widespread detritus → High risk: Seed bed established - Grade D: Heavily affected → Failure: Silt buildup supports deep-rooting weeds
Strategic Argument: "Weeds are evidence of detritus management failure. Mechanical removal fulfills both EPA 1990 (cleansing) AND NAP 2025 (pesticide reduction)."
🎯 The Three-Tier IWM Strategy (Prevention-First Framework)
The NAP 2025 compliance strategy follows a hierarchical approach:
TIER 1: PREVENTION (Mechanical Silt Removal) — PRIMARY
Method: Mechanical sweeping and weed brushing to remove detritus (the seed bed).
Why This Comes First: - Removes soil/silt = no growing medium = weeds cannot establish - Proven Impact: Bracknell Town Council trial (2026) showing one mechanical pass (late winter) = Potential >50% reduction in remedial thermal/chemical treatments across the full growing season - Fulfills EPA 1990 Section 89 cleansing duties simultaneously
Recommended Equipment: - Mechanical Sweepers — For pavements, car parks, hard surfaces - Weed Brushes — For kerb edges, block paving, moss removal
Target Standard: Maintain COPLAR Grade A/B (predominantly free of detritus).
TIER 2: SUPPRESSION (Thermal/Physical Control) — SECONDARY
Method: Non-chemical heat or physical removal for emerged weeds.
When to Use: After mechanical prevention, if weeds still exceed acceptable thresholds (safety, accessibility, asset protection).
Technologies:
Hot Water Weed Control
- How it Works: 100°C+ saturated water delivered to leaves and roots. Heat destroys chloroplasts (photosynthesis) and melts waxy coating (dehydration). Soil thermal mass maintains lethal root temperatures for 20+ minutes.
- Advantages:
- Zero consumables (no foam additives required)
- No residue or slip hazards
- All-weather capable
- Recommended Systems: Eco Weedkiller Pro 10/20
- Learn More: Hot Water Science
Hot Air/Flame Weed Control
- How it Works: 450-700°C radiant heat delivered via LPG burner. Penetrates permeable surfaces (gravel, soil).
- Advantages: Works on wet surfaces, deep penetration
- Recommended Systems: Hoaf Thermal Units
Electrophysical Weed Control
- How it Works: High-voltage current (8,000-15,000V) passes through plant to root, causing internal resistance heating.
- Advantages: Root destruction, no water/fuel needed
- Recommended Systems: Zasso XPower
See Full Comparison: Chemical-Free Weed Control Methods
TIER 3: CHEMICAL (Targeted) — LAST RESORT ONLY
When Permitted: Only for invasive species (Japanese Knotweed, Giant Hogweed) or where mechanical and thermal methods have failed.
Method: Stem injection or targeted spot treatment (not broadcast spraying).
Documentation Required: Record why non-chemical methods were insufficient or impractical.
💰 Business Case: Why Prevention Saves Money
The Cost Comparison
| Method | Annual Cost (Per KM) | Frequency | Total Annual Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thermal Only (No Prevention) | £1,200/km | 4-5x/year | £4,800 - £6,000 |
| Prevention + Thermal (IWM) | £600 + £600 | 1x + 2x | £1,800 |
Savings with IWM: £600 - £1,400 per km per year
Why Prevention Works: - One mechanical pass removes the seed bed - Reduces thermal frequency by 50%+ - Eliminates chemical procurement costs - No foam/additive consumables
Carbon & Environmental Impact
Glyphosate Lifecycle Emissions: - 360g active ingredient per litre (standard concentration) - Lifecycle CO₂e: 30.5 kg per litre (Cranfield University data) - Example: 200L annual usage = 6,100 kg CO₂e = equivalent to 244 mature trees
Mechanical Prevention: - Zero chemical emissions - Petrol/electric sweeper emissions offset by reduced thermal passes - Supports Net Zero commitments
Use Our Calculator: Carbon & Cost Savings Audit Tool
🛠️ Implementation Roadmap
Phase 1: Audit & Planning (Months 1-2)
Actions: 1. COPLAR Assessment: Grade your streets (A/B/C/D) for detritus levels 2. Asset Mapping: Identify surface types (asphalt, block paving, resin, permeable) 3. Weed Threshold Definition: What level of weed presence is acceptable? (Safety vs. aesthetics) 4. Equipment Audit: What do you already own? What's needed?
Support: Request a Kersten NAP 2025 Compliance Audit
Phase 2: Procurement & Training (Months 3-4)
Equipment Procurement: - Priority 1: Mechanical sweeper or weed brush (prevention) - Priority 2: Thermal system (suppression) - Priority 3: Spreader/plough (if winter maintenance needed)
Training Requirements: - Lantra IWM Certification: Course 35943 (authored by Sean Faulkner) - Operator training for thermal systems - HAVS compliance for mechanical equipment
Contract Wording: - Critical: Ensure tender documents allow IWM approach - Avoid: Fixed chemical application schedules (e.g., "spray 4x per year") - Include: Outcome-based standards (COPLAR grades, safety thresholds)
Phase 3: Trial Implementation (Months 5-6)
Pilot Site Selection: - Choose 2-3 representative areas - Mix of high-footfall (town center) and lower-priority (residential) - Document baseline weed coverage with photos
Trial Protocol: 1. Week 1: Mechanical pass to remove detritus 2. Week 4: Assess weed emergence 3. Week 8: Thermal treatment if needed 4. Week 16: Final assessment vs. baseline
Metrics to Track: - Weed reduction (visual scale or photo comparison) - Treatment frequency (mechanical vs. thermal vs. chemical) - Cost per pass - Resident feedback
Phase 4: Full Rollout (Months 7-12)
Scale-Up: - Extend pilot success to entire network - Adjust equipment/resource allocation based on trial data - Establish maintenance schedules
Communication: - Resident engagement: "We're reducing pesticides" - Staff briefings: New procedures, equipment training - Elected member updates: Cost savings, environmental benefits
📊 Monitoring & Reporting
What to Record (NAP 2025 Compliance)
Pesticide Use:
- Active ingredient quantity (kg)
- Application area (m² or km)
- Justification for use (if any)
- Pesticide Load Indicator
Non-Chemical Interventions:
- Mechanical passes (frequency, area)
- Thermal treatments (frequency, area)
- Equipment used
Outcomes:
- COPLAR grade maintenance
- Weed coverage reduction
- Cost per km
- Carbon savings
- Pesticide Load Reduction
Reporting Frequency: Annual submission to Defra (exact format TBC).
🎓 Training & Certification
Lantra IWM Training (Course 35943)
- Author: Sean Faulkner, Kersten UK
- Duration: 1 day
- Content: IWM hierarchy, equipment operation, legal compliance
- Certification: Nationally recognized
- Book: Lantra IWM Course
Kersten Equipment Training
- Included with equipment purchase
- On-site or at Kersten facility
- HAVS safety briefings
- Operator best practices
📚 Essential Resources
Official Guidance:
Parks for London IWM Reference Guide 2025 (Contributed to by Sean Faulkner)
- IWM Policy Template (editable)
- IWM Plan Template (editable)
- Case studies from UK councils
The Amenity Forum (Industry best practice)
Kersten Technical Guides:
- Integrated Weed Management Hub
- Chemical-Free Weed Control Methods
- Mechanical Prevention Equipment
- Thermal Suppression Equipment
Case Studies:
- Bracknell Town Council Trial (2026) — reduction evidence
- Cambridge City Council Herbicide Reduction Plan
- City of Edinburgh Council Success Story
🤝 Get Expert Support
NAP 2025 Compliance Audit
Sean Faulkner offers strategy reviews for councils, housing associations, and large estates.
What's Included: - Site assessment (COPLAR grading) - Equipment recommendations - Cost-benefit analysis - 5-year implementation roadmap
Book Your Audit: Contact Sean Faulkner | 0118 986 9253
Equipment Demonstrations
On-Site Trials: - Test equipment on your actual surfaces - See prevention + suppression in action - Compare mechanical vs. thermal performance
Request Demo: Book a Site Visit
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do we have to eliminate all pesticides immediately?
No. NAP 2025 requires a phased approach. Start with mechanical prevention, reduce chemical frequency, and we can help you transition over 2-3 years.
What if we have invasive species like Japanese Knotweed?
Chemical treatment remains permitted for invasive species where other methods fail. Document why non-chemical approaches were insufficient.
Can we use foam additives with hot water systems?
You can, but it's not necessary. Kersten's Eco Weedkiller Pro systems use saturated steam physics (Flash Steam + Soil Thermal Mass) for effective root kill without consumables.
How do we handle resident complaints about "untidy" weeds?
Education is key. Most residents support pesticide-free once they understand the health benefits. Use signage: "Pesticide-free for your safety — tolerance levels set for your protection."
What about areas with parked cars blocking pavement access?
See our guide: Solving the Pavement Puzzle: IWM for Car-Lined Streets
Is mechanical equipment safe? (HAVS compliance)
Kersten equipment is engineered for low vibration (typically 1.6-2.5 m/s²), allowing 8+ hours of safe continuous use. See our HAVS Compliance Guide.
What's the difference between "Integrated Pest Management" and "Integrated Weed Management"?
They're the same framework. "IPM" is the international term; "IWM" is UK-specific when applied to weeds. Both follow the prevention → suppression → chemical hierarchy.
📞 Next Steps
1. Download the Official Templates: - IWM Policy Template (from Parks for London Guide) - IWM Plan Template
2. Request Your Compliance Audit: Contact Sean Faulkner | 0118 986 9253
3. Book Equipment Demonstrations: Schedule On-Site Trial
4. Enroll in Lantra IWM Training: Book Course 35943
🏆 About the Author
Sean Faulkner
IWM Specialist
Kersten UK Ltd
Credentials: - Contributing Author, Defra-funded Parks for London IWM Reference Guide 2025 - Architect, Lantra-Certified IWM Training Syllabus (Course 35943) - Trustee, Parks for London - Trustee, Managing the Green Planet - GMA 35 Under 35 Winner (2025) - Suez Environment 100 Award
Contact: seanf@kerstenuk.com | 0118 986 9253
This guide is maintained by Kersten UK and updated regularly to reflect the latest NAP 2025 implementation guidance. Last updated: February 2026.